The “No Homebirth Policy” casts a shadow over the risks of childbirth beyond hospital walls. In remote communities, mothers and midwives navigate birth with improvised tools and ancestral knowledge, where every heartbeat is a testament to courage. Amid danger and uncertainty, the resilience of life persists, quietly threading hope through each delivery.
Alam mo ba ang No Home Birth Policy noong ipinatupad ito? Ano ang pinakatumatak o nag-iwan ng malalim na impresyon sa iyo tungkol sa patakarang ito?
Last edited 2 months ago by GitingNgDuyan
Gina Novelantes
2 months ago
Matagal ko nang nabalitaang no home birth.. pero kse marami ako nakikilalang mga nanay mas ginusto na magtawag ng midwifery dahil mabilis at natural basta kilala at may lisensya… kami dito mga nakatira sa subdivision.. khit malapit lang mga ospital dito pero ang mahal parin ng babayaran lalo na ang hirap mamuhay ng walang wala talaga
Freida Lacson
2 months ago
May kasabihang pag nanganganak ka ang isang paa ay nasa hukay,dahil sa kakulangan ng kaalaman marami sa ating mga katutubo ay namatay o nasisilang na nanganganib ang buhay.Wala ding sapat na lugar paanakan,at mga nagiging mga batang ina nawala pang sapat na kaalaman.Salamat sa mga NGO at mga medical volunteer’s na nagsisikap matating ang mga malalayo at liblib na lugar na kahit paano ay nakakapag hatid ng kaalaman sa ating mga katutubo(aeta,mangyan,tasaday)upang kahit paano ay mamulat sila at mas maging ligtas sa pag luwal ng kanilang sangol.May mga nabuksan na ring libreng bahay panganakan na sana ay matating na din sa mga mas nangangailangan
Nathan de Torres
2 months ago
I think this is a classic case of regressive paternalism. The policy seems to standardize proper health practices but its implementation seems to be premature being without established health infrastructure and support. Equipping the local midwives and hospitals with more than sufficient tools, drugs, and facilities especially in remote areas first would have prevented unacceptable cases/deaths. The policy is well-intentioned but its execution too hasty.
Joaquin Guevarra
2 months ago
To be honest, I was never aware of the ‘No Home Birth Policy.’ When it came to giving birth outside of a hospital, I only knew about emergency cases where time was not on the mother’s side and she had no choice but to deliver outside of hospital walls. I never knew that it was actually not allowed as a general practice. And when it comes to the stories of the mothers, especially Nanay Rosalie, really hit home because no mother should have to go through this kind of pain while delivering or giving birth to their child. It also really hurts to hear that these mothers can only rely on themselves or their husbands because of the lack of access to hospitals being that they are far from the nearest one. They can only use the limited equipment they have lying around. It truly hurts knowing that these mothers have to endure this pain and suffering that no mother should.
Cesca Atienza
2 months ago
What really stood out to me about the No Home Birth Policy is that the intention was good to make childbirth safer for both the mother and the baby but the implementation was lacking. Not everyone has easy access to hospitals or can afford hospital fees, especially those in poor or remote areas. Many mothers still prefer licensed midwives because they are more accessible and affordable. The policy felt rushed since proper healthcare facilities and support systems were not fully in place before it was enforced.
Last edited 2 months ago by Cesca Atienza
Matthew Uy
2 months ago
What struck me most in the video was how the “No Homebirth Policy”, while framed as a safety measure, actually exposes deep inequalities in access to healthcare. With regard to this, hospital births are meant to protect mothers and infants—but for women in remote communities, hospitals are not a realistic option. Their reliance on ancestral knowledge and improvised tools isn’t a rejection of modern medicine, but a response to being excluded from it.
Alvin Dimla
2 months ago
This passage powerfully captures the quiet tension between policy and lived reality. While the ‘No Homebirth Policy’ is framed around safety, the narrative reminds us that for many remote communities, childbirth outside hospital walls is not a choice but a necessity—one sustained by ancestral knowledge, adaptability, and resilience. It invites us to question whether risk truly lies in homebirth itself, or in the systemic gaps that leave mothers and midwives navigating life-and-death moments without adequate support.
Kim Mabalot
2 months ago
even if the intention of home birth is good, especially because it feels more comfortable and personal for the mother, it is still definitely dangerous, particularly when unexpected complications happen. not all emergencies can be managed at home, and without proper medical equipment and trained professionals, the risk to both the mother and the baby becomes much higher. another major issue is that the policy was NOT implemented well. home birth was discouraged, but access to safe and nearby birthing facilities was not fully ensured, especially for people in remote areas. because of this, some were still forced to give birth at home despite the risks.
a better solution would be to make safe birthing services more accessible and easier for everyone to reach, while also providing proper training and certification for birth attendants such as midwives. with enough training, they would know how to handle deliveries safely and when to refer cases to hospitals. the intention of the policy was good, but it would be more effective if it focused on access, support, and proper training rather than rules alone.
Yanna Chua
2 months ago
This documentary goes deep! It bravely shows the real-life dangers caused by the “No Homebirth Policy” The docu is a raw look at mothers and midwives who fight against the odds, using only their ancestral knowledge and what they can find (improvised tools).
Midwives are true heroes indeed, their wisdom and skill are what save lives. They are the light in the shadow of this policy. The film proves that even in great danger, the resilience of life always wins. A must-watch.
Weny Hernandez
2 months ago
This short film is very informative and eye opener. It comes to my knowledge that this kind of practices still exists particularly in the provinces and remote areas. Life is so precious that needs utmost attention and care. Emphasizing that no homebirth policy is really important to protect lives particularly the mother and child. Spread the news, love and care by protecting the lives of our love ones through proper education that no homebirth policy is the first move to take.
Mike Aspan
2 months ago
This is exactly why policy can’t just be top-down. It has to be shaped by the people living these realities, in this case, the mothers/midwives/community, and not decided by those who’ll never see or understand them.
Robert John Gaviola
2 months ago
I think the nature of all-inclusive laws should always be double-checked. Certain communities get affected in different ways, and I believe that laws are created to protect society, but be at the service of those inside it, and any rule that creates difficulty for certain communities, especially those highlighted within this documentary, needs to be put into question. Some communities are more vulnerable than others, and bringing light to these issues is the only way we’d be able to move forward and progress.
Melody Usman
2 months ago
Yes aware na ako sa “No Home Birth Policy”.
Mas mainam nadin ito para mas matutukan yung safety both sa mother at baby kapag nanganganak. Incase ano ang mangyari sa mother or baby atleast nasa ospital na sila at maaagapan. But base sa sarili kong experience na nanganak sa bahay sa tatlo kong anak , malaking tulong din ang mga midwife na magpapaanak sa bahay gaya ko na walang pang bayad sa ospital. At mas naniniwala ako na higit na nangangailangan nito ay yung mga taong nasa malalayo sa ospital at nasa liblib na lugar. Mas malaking tulong sakanila yung may Midwife o hilot na may knowledge at experience at kayang magpaanak sa bahay. To guide nadin bago dalhin sa ospital incase na hindi na kinaya ng nanay na makaabot sa ospital gayong malayo ito..
Alam mo ba ang No Home Birth Policy noong ipinatupad ito? Ano ang pinakatumatak o nag-iwan ng malalim na impresyon sa iyo tungkol sa patakarang ito?
Matagal ko nang nabalitaang no home birth.. pero kse marami ako nakikilalang mga nanay mas ginusto na magtawag ng midwifery dahil mabilis at natural basta kilala at may lisensya… kami dito mga nakatira sa subdivision.. khit malapit lang mga ospital dito pero ang mahal parin ng babayaran lalo na ang hirap mamuhay ng walang wala talaga
May kasabihang pag nanganganak ka ang isang paa ay nasa hukay,dahil sa kakulangan ng kaalaman marami sa ating mga katutubo ay namatay o nasisilang na nanganganib ang buhay.Wala ding sapat na lugar paanakan,at mga nagiging mga batang ina nawala pang sapat na kaalaman.Salamat sa mga NGO at mga medical volunteer’s na nagsisikap matating ang mga malalayo at liblib na lugar na kahit paano ay nakakapag hatid ng kaalaman sa ating mga katutubo(aeta,mangyan,tasaday)upang kahit paano ay mamulat sila at mas maging ligtas sa pag luwal ng kanilang sangol.May mga nabuksan na ring libreng bahay panganakan na sana ay matating na din sa mga mas nangangailangan
I think this is a classic case of regressive paternalism. The policy seems to standardize proper health practices but its implementation seems to be premature being without established health infrastructure and support. Equipping the local midwives and hospitals with more than sufficient tools, drugs, and facilities especially in remote areas first would have prevented unacceptable cases/deaths. The policy is well-intentioned but its execution too hasty.
To be honest, I was never aware of the ‘No Home Birth Policy.’ When it came to giving birth outside of a hospital, I only knew about emergency cases where time was not on the mother’s side and she had no choice but to deliver outside of hospital walls. I never knew that it was actually not allowed as a general practice. And when it comes to the stories of the mothers, especially Nanay Rosalie, really hit home because no mother should have to go through this kind of pain while delivering or giving birth to their child. It also really hurts to hear that these mothers can only rely on themselves or their husbands because of the lack of access to hospitals being that they are far from the nearest one. They can only use the limited equipment they have lying around. It truly hurts knowing that these mothers have to endure this pain and suffering that no mother should.
What really stood out to me about the No Home Birth Policy is that the intention was good to make childbirth safer for both the mother and the baby but the implementation was lacking. Not everyone has easy access to hospitals or can afford hospital fees, especially those in poor or remote areas. Many mothers still prefer licensed midwives because they are more accessible and affordable. The policy felt rushed since proper healthcare facilities and support systems were not fully in place before it was enforced.
What struck me most in the video was how the “No Homebirth Policy”, while framed as a safety measure, actually exposes deep inequalities in access to healthcare. With regard to this, hospital births are meant to protect mothers and infants—but for women in remote communities, hospitals are not a realistic option. Their reliance on ancestral knowledge and improvised tools isn’t a rejection of modern medicine, but a response to being excluded from it.
This passage powerfully captures the quiet tension between policy and lived reality. While the ‘No Homebirth Policy’ is framed around safety, the narrative reminds us that for many remote communities, childbirth outside hospital walls is not a choice but a necessity—one sustained by ancestral knowledge, adaptability, and resilience. It invites us to question whether risk truly lies in homebirth itself, or in the systemic gaps that leave mothers and midwives navigating life-and-death moments without adequate support.
even if the intention of home birth is good, especially because it feels more comfortable and personal for the mother, it is still definitely dangerous, particularly when unexpected complications happen. not all emergencies can be managed at home, and without proper medical equipment and trained professionals, the risk to both the mother and the baby becomes much higher. another major issue is that the policy was NOT implemented well. home birth was discouraged, but access to safe and nearby birthing facilities was not fully ensured, especially for people in remote areas. because of this, some were still forced to give birth at home despite the risks.
a better solution would be to make safe birthing services more accessible and easier for everyone to reach, while also providing proper training and certification for birth attendants such as midwives. with enough training, they would know how to handle deliveries safely and when to refer cases to hospitals. the intention of the policy was good, but it would be more effective if it focused on access, support, and proper training rather than rules alone.
This documentary goes deep! It bravely shows the real-life dangers caused by the “No Homebirth Policy” The docu is a raw look at mothers and midwives who fight against the odds, using only their ancestral knowledge and what they can find (improvised tools).
Midwives are true heroes indeed, their wisdom and skill are what save lives. They are the light in the shadow of this policy. The film proves that even in great danger, the resilience of life always wins. A must-watch.
This short film is very informative and eye opener. It comes to my knowledge that this kind of practices still exists particularly in the provinces and remote areas. Life is so precious that needs utmost attention and care. Emphasizing that no homebirth policy is really important to protect lives particularly the mother and child. Spread the news, love and care by protecting the lives of our love ones through proper education that no homebirth policy is the first move to take.
This is exactly why policy can’t just be top-down. It has to be shaped by the people living these realities, in this case, the mothers/midwives/community, and not decided by those who’ll never see or understand them.
I think the nature of all-inclusive laws should always be double-checked. Certain communities get affected in different ways, and I believe that laws are created to protect society, but be at the service of those inside it, and any rule that creates difficulty for certain communities, especially those highlighted within this documentary, needs to be put into question. Some communities are more vulnerable than others, and bringing light to these issues is the only way we’d be able to move forward and progress.
Yes aware na ako sa “No Home Birth Policy”.
Mas mainam nadin ito para mas matutukan yung safety both sa mother at baby kapag nanganganak. Incase ano ang mangyari sa mother or baby atleast nasa ospital na sila at maaagapan. But base sa sarili kong experience na nanganak sa bahay sa tatlo kong anak , malaking tulong din ang mga midwife na magpapaanak sa bahay gaya ko na walang pang bayad sa ospital. At mas naniniwala ako na higit na nangangailangan nito ay yung mga taong nasa malalayo sa ospital at nasa liblib na lugar. Mas malaking tulong sakanila yung may Midwife o hilot na may knowledge at experience at kayang magpaanak sa bahay. To guide nadin bago dalhin sa ospital incase na hindi na kinaya ng nanay na makaabot sa ospital gayong malayo ito..